Philosophical foundations of educational development in Mongolia
DOI :
https://doi.org/10.56380/mjer.si.2024.01Keywords :
vision, value, learners' profile, ethos, eidos, praxisAbstract
There has been growing needs to encourage competing thoughts, debates, cooperation and research works that support critical thoughts, ideas, concepts, approaches, doctrines, and philosophies on development of education in Mongolia.
Nowadays, system inquiry is often regarded as systematic approach for educational development. System inquiry consists of three inter-related components including system theory, system philosophy, and system approach. System philosophy explains the universe from system view and employs system thinking as an approach to theoretical and real life problems.
Itgel and his colleagues (2018, 2023, 2024) published serial articles, which put forward solutions to develop education in system approach. One of the main findings of these articles identified Mongolian education vision, values, learners’ profile employing qualitative and quantitative approach. Hence, the current article attempts to give a philosophical explanation to the above-mentioned findings.
We Mongolians place greater emphasis on the beginning and root of anything as we attempt to identify its true meaning and nature. This can be easily observed in our language, culture and way of thinking. As it is traced back to the beginning of philosophy, we can find three concepts namely “ethos, eidos, praxis”.
This study identified 47 possibilities for interactions of these three concepts. As it is conceptually mapped, “Mongolian education vision” can be coined as “ethos”, “Mongolian education values” can be coined as “eidos” and Mongolian learners’ profile can be coined as “praxis” as they are structured to contain one another.
Although Mongolian education vision, values, and learners’ profile are identified having their own special characteristics, they are exactly consistent with the topological structure of the global education paradigm.
Finally, the article offers three possibilities to expand the ideas of this study.
Downloads
References
Монгол хэлээр:
Бадарч, Д., Мөнххүж, Б. (2014). Системийн сэтгэлгээ, Улаанбаатар: ШУТИС хэвлэх үйлдвэр.
Бадарч, Д. (2021). Дээд боловсролын онол, арга зүй (Парадигмийн шижилт, багшлахуй, суралцахуй) Дэд дэвтэр. Улаанбаатар: ШУТИС-ийн хэвлэх газар.
Баттөмөр, Д. (2005). Логик, эпистимологи, шинжлэх ухааны философийн асуудлууд. Улаанбаатар.
БСҮХ, МУИС. (2024). Боловсролын философийн тухай эргэцүүлэл. (Монголын боловсролын философи цуврал №2). Улаанбаатар.
Бэгз, Н. (2008). Боловсролын хөгжлийн онол, арга зүйн асуудлууд. Улаанбаатар: Соёмбо принтинг.
Бэгз, Н., Пүрэв, О., Энхцогт, Н., Баттогтох, Д., Баярцэцэг, Б., Мягмар, П., Лхагвасүрэн, Ц., Тунгалаг. П. (2012). Боловсролын философи. (Эрхлэн гаргасан байгууллага: Боловсролын хүрээлэн) Улаанбаатар: Соёмбо принтинг.
Бэгз, Н. (2023). Монголын боловсрол судлал. Улаанбаатар: Соёмбо принтинг.
Итгэл, М., Отгонбаатар, Х., Туяа, У., Эрдэнэ, Л., & Пунцагсүрэн, Д. (2023). Боловсролыг системийн үзлээр хөгжүүлэх шийдлүүд. Боловсролын Судалгааны Монголын Сэтгүүл, 28 (1). https://doi.org/10.56380/mjer.v28.1.2
Итгэл, М., Отгонбаатар, Х., Санжаабадам, С., Туяа, У., Энхжаргал, Х., & Дэнсмаа, Ж. (2024). Монголын боловсролын тогтвортой хөгжүүлэх үзэл санаа. Боловсролын Судалгааны Монголын Сэтгүүл, 29(2). https://doi.org/10.56380/mjer.v29.2.1
Отгонбаяр, М. (2016). Логик. Улаанбаатар: МУИС-ийн хэвлэх үйлдвэр.
Философийн хүрээлэн. (2015). Монголын философийн номзүй (Эмхт. Золзаяа, Жигмэддорж). Улаанбаатар.
Цанжид, А. (2022). Уугуул Монгол соёл. Улаанбаатар: Соёмбо принтинг
Эрдэнэ-Очир, Г. (1983). Зарим зүйр цэцэн үгийн тайлбар толь. Улаанбаатар: Ардын боловсролын яамны хэвлэл.
Англи хэлээр:
Banathy, B. H., Jenlink, P. M. (2004). Systems inquiry and its application in education. In D. H. E. Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook of research for educational communications and technology (2nd ed., pp. 37-58). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Bertalanffy, L. (1968). General systems theory. New York: Braziller.
Bosevska, J. Kriewaldt, J. (2019). Fostering a whole-school approach to sustainability: learning from one school’s journey towards sustainable education. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 29(1), 55–73. https://doi.org/10.1080/10382046.2019.1661127
OECD. (2019). Future of Education and Skills 2030. Conceptual learning framework. Skills for 2030. Татаж авсан холбоос https://www.oecd.org/en/about/projects/future-of-education-and-skills- 2030.html
Sterling, S. (2003). Whole systems thinking as a basis for paradigm change in education: Explorations in the context of sustainability (PhD Dissertation). University of Bath.
UN. (2023). Report on the 2022 Transforming Education Summit.
UNESCO. (2021). Reimagining our futures together: a new social contract for education. Paris, 186 pages, ISBN 978-92-3-100478-0. Татаж авсан холбоос Reimagining our futures together: a new social contract for education;executive summary - UNESCO Digital Library
WEF. (2023). Defining Education 4.0: A Taxonomy for the Future of Learning. https://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_Defining_Education_4.0_2023.pdf